2.0b3 Does Not Support Strict / Standards-Compliant mode correctly in BEA Weblogic Portal.
I am trying to implement a grid in BEA Weblogic Portal 8.1.4, which forces the strict document type. This is causing significat problems with Grid 2.0 (beta 3) when it is implemented in a portlet.
(1.0 does not work at all- see this post http://www.activewidgets.com/javascript.forum.5548.6/grid-problems-under-weblogic-portal.html)
Basically all formatting (grid height and width) and column widths are not being displayed correctly inside of the portlet, and default values are being used. Additionaly, when Resizing a column or scrolling down the grid, the redraw rate is extremely slow and sometimes does not redraw unless you place your mouse over the affected areas.
Removing the "strict" doc type (only for experimentation, portal requires strict doctypes) fixes the problems with the sizing, but the problem with the redraw rate remains (our table is large; 23 columns and 50+ rows).
Does anybody have any suggestions on how to fix this problem. We created a prototype with the grid 1.0 and our client loved it, but if it can not be implemented inside of a portlet than it is useless. Am i missing a setting that turns on the grid "standards compliant mode"? Does beta3 not have all of the "strict" functionality?
Any and all insight is greatly appreciated.
(1.0 does not work at all- see this post http://www.activewidgets.com/javascript.forum.5548.6/grid-problems-under-weblogic-portal.html)
Basically all formatting (grid height and width) and column widths are not being displayed correctly inside of the portlet, and default values are being used. Additionaly, when Resizing a column or scrolling down the grid, the redraw rate is extremely slow and sometimes does not redraw unless you place your mouse over the affected areas.
Removing the "strict" doc type (only for experimentation, portal requires strict doctypes) fixes the problems with the sizing, but the problem with the redraw rate remains (our table is large; 23 columns and 50+ rows).
Does anybody have any suggestions on how to fix this problem. We created a prototype with the grid 1.0 and our client loved it, but if it can not be implemented inside of a portlet than it is useless. Am i missing a setting that turns on the grid "standards compliant mode"? Does beta3 not have all of the "strict" functionality?
Any and all insight is greatly appreciated.
Ryan
December 6,